<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cif110</id>
	<title>ChemWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cif110"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cif110"/>
	<updated>2026-07-10T06:37:47Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332955</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332955"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T17:01:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the formation of the endo adduct, there is an activation energy of 0.04260797 hartrees, whereas the activation energy for the exo adduct is 0.04369293 hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the thermodynamic and kinetic product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. This lobe shows secondary orbital overlap as both as there contributions from orbitals that are not directly involved in the bond breaking and making&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[3]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again, which also displays secondary orbital overlap, and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. This lobe appears to show secondary orbital overlap. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;br /&gt;
2. https://webspace.utexas.edu/ccl524/CH318N/33-sigma.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
3. M. A. Fox, R. Cardona and N. J. Kiwiet, &#039;&#039;J. Org. Chem.&#039;&#039; 1987,&#039;&#039;&#039;52&#039;&#039;&#039;, 1469-1474&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332943</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332943"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:59:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the formation of the endo adduct, there is an activation energy of 0.04260797 hartrees, whereas the activation energy for the exo adduct is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. This lobe shows secondary orbital overlap as both as there contributions from orbitals that are not directly involved in the bond breaking and making&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[3]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again, which also displays secondary orbital overlap, and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. This lobe appears to show secondary orbital overlap. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;br /&gt;
2. https://webspace.utexas.edu/ccl524/CH318N/33-sigma.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
3. M. A. Fox, R. Cardona and N. J. Kiwiet, &#039;&#039;J. Org. Chem.&#039;&#039; 1987,&#039;&#039;&#039;52&#039;&#039;&#039;, 1469-1474&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332894</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332894"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:50:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. This lobe shows secondary orbital overlap as both as there contributions from orbitals that are not directly involved in the bond breaking and making&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[3]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again, which also displays secondary orbital overlap, and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. This lobe appears to show secondary orbital overlap. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;br /&gt;
2. https://webspace.utexas.edu/ccl524/CH318N/33-sigma.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
3. M. A. Fox, R. Cardona and N. J. Kiwiet, &#039;&#039;J. Org. Chem.&#039;&#039; 1987,&#039;&#039;&#039;52&#039;&#039;&#039;, 1469-1474&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332887</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332887"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:49:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. This lobe shows secondary orbital overlap as both as there contributions from orbitals that are not directly involved in the bond breaking and making&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[3]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again, which also displays secondary orbital overlap, and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. This lobe appears to show secondary orbital overlap. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1.Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;br /&gt;
2.https://webspace.utexas.edu/ccl524/CH318N/33-sigma.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332850</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332850"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:36:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1.Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;br /&gt;
2.https://webspace.utexas.edu/ccl524/CH318N/33-sigma.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332848</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332848"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:35:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1.Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332846</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332846"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:35:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the energy of app2 1,5-Hexadiene and the chair transition state, the activation energy is about 45.8Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, which significantly higher than the literature value of 34Kcalmol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, thus the transition state is likely to be in a boat conformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1.Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332799</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332799"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T16:18:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, the carbon carbon double bond lengths in cyclohexadiene are 1.34279Å, which then extends to 1.39307Å in the conjugated transition state, which then finally reaches 1.50265Å in the adduct, by which point the bond is now a single bond between a sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons, which is in good agreement with literature&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; values of 1.50Å for such bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single bond between the two double bonds in cyclohexadiene is initially 1.44955Å, though this is shortened to 1.39724Å in the transition state and finally 1.34385Å in the adduct, by which point it is a carbon carbon double bond. In both of these circumstances, the transition state bond lengths more similar in length to the reactants than the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
1.Fox, Marye Anne; Whitesell, James K. (1995). Organische Chemie: Grundlagen, Mechanismen, Bioorganische Anwendungen. Springer. ISBN 978-3-86025-249-9.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332745</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332745"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T15:57:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state is like the that of the exo transition state in that there is a molecular orbital that resembles the HOMO of cis-butadiene and one of the lobes extends elsewhere throughout the molecule, however, here that lobe is a bit more diffuse and extends over the ring of the anhydride in a spiral like manner, ending with joining up with a p orbital like lobe on the central oxygen. The carbonyl oxygens have localised p orbital like lobes. As for the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragment from the cyclohexadiene, there is a lobe pair over a CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with the carbon as the nodal point, with one of the lobes extending diagonally onto the next carbon, where it is there paired with a smaller lobe in the opposite phase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO mainly consists of highly extended lobes. The main feature is that there is a node where one of the carbon carbon sigma bonds are forming whereas there appears to only be constructive interactions around where the other bond is being formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO for the adduct is very similar in comparison to the exo&#039;s equivalent, mainly in that there is a pi bonding interaction over the new carbon carbon double bond and there are similar orbitals about the other CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments. Only the central oxygen, however, has a p orbital like lobe about it however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO again is similar in that there are pi* antibonding orbitals about the carbon oxygen double bonds, however, there is no antibonding about the carbon carbon double bond. There is instead a small lobe on the adjacent carbons, each lobe being of the opposite phase.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332668</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332668"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T15:27:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Exo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Exo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a group of lobes that resemble the HOMO of cis-butadiene, however, here one of the lobes extend over the maleic anhydride fragment, especially where the new sigma bonds are being formed. There is a lobe (which is in the same phase as the aforementioned lobe) that extends from the two bottom sp&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; hybridised carbons of cyclohexadiene to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms. That oxygen atom is the nodal point of the lobe, with a lobe of the opposite phase on the other side of the oxygen. There is a similar p-orbital like lobe on the other carbonyl oxygen, however this doesn&#039;t interact with other lobes, there is also a similar one on the central oxygen, though this is much smaller. There is a small lobe that is sandwiched in between the two previously mentioned extended lobes, which of the opposite phase. There is also an extended lobe over three carbon atoms of the maleic anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state is similar in that there is group of lobes that resemble the LUMO of cis-butadiene, however one lobe extends to one of the carbonyl oxygens again and another extends over some of the anhydride fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO and LUMO of the adduct are comparitively localised and a lobe barely extends over more than two atoms at most. The HOMO consists of a distorted pi-bonding lobe over the newly formed carbon carbon double bond in the &#039;cyclohexadiene&#039; fragment as well as two smaller lobe pairs over the CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-CH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; fragments in the new bicyclic system. Each oxygen has a p orbital like lobe on it which localised on each atom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO largely consists of antibonding interaction lobes. Firstly, there is a pi* antibonding orbital focused on the new carbon carbon double bond that extends onto the adjacent carbons. There are also pi* antibonding orbital over each Carbon Oxygen double bond that also extends over the adjacent carbon atoms.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332566</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332566"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:49:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332562</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332562"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:48:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg|thumb|300px| ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|widthpx|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_TS_LUMO.jpg&amp;diff=332559</id>
		<title>File:Exo adduct TS LUMO.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_TS_LUMO.jpg&amp;diff=332559"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:48:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_TS_HOMO.jpg&amp;diff=332558</id>
		<title>File:Exo adduct TS HOMO.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_TS_HOMO.jpg&amp;diff=332558"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:48:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_TS_LUMO.jpg&amp;diff=332557</id>
		<title>File:Endo adduct TS LUMO.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_TS_LUMO.jpg&amp;diff=332557"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:48:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_TS_HOMO.jpg&amp;diff=332556</id>
		<title>File:Endo adduct TS HOMO.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_TS_HOMO.jpg&amp;diff=332556"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:48:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332527</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332527"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:41:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Diels-Alder */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo_adduct_TS_LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo_adduct_TS_HOMO.png |thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332518</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332518"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:40:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo adduct TS HOMO.png |thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332513</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332513"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:37:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo TS LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo TS HOMO.png |thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332489</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332489"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:32:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run on each of the adducts and their transition state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo MOs&lt;br /&gt;
!   !!Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| LUMO|| [[Image:Endo TS LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct LUMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| HOMO|| [[Image:Endo TS HOMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell ]]|| [[Image:Endo adduct HOMO.png|thumb|widthpx|cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332457</id>
		<title>File:Exo TS LUMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332457"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Exo TS LUMO.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332456</id>
		<title>File:Exo TS HOMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332456"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Exo TS HOMO.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332455</id>
		<title>File:Exo adduct LUMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332455"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332454</id>
		<title>File:Exo adduct HOMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332454"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332453</id>
		<title>File:Endo TS LUMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332453"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Endo TS LUMO.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332452</id>
		<title>File:Endo TS HOMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332452"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Endo TS HOMO.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332451</id>
		<title>File:Endo adduct LUMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_LUMO.png&amp;diff=332451"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332450</id>
		<title>File:Endo adduct HOMO.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct_HOMO.png&amp;diff=332450"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T14:24:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332133</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332133"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T12:53:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HOMO of the transition state consists of a somewhat distorted pi bonding MO of ethene and a pi-bonding MO within the diene, however, the bottom lobe extends over the terminal carbon atoms of the diene. There is a node, therefore antibonding interaction, between the ethene&#039;s MO and the diene&#039;s MO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LUMO of the transition state consists of a MO of the diene that resembles the LUMO of the isolated diene, however, here a two lobes that are beneath the two terminal carbons of the diene join up as a single lobe. There is an MO that covers the ethene fragment which again resembles a distorted pi-bonding MO, however, here the ethene MO is more distorted as the upper lobe extends up to the diene fragment and there is a strong bonding interaction with the central bottom lobe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332056</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=332056"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T12:30:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Butadiene */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric in the plane|| Antisymmetric in the plane&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331615</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331615"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T04:17:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Diels-Alder */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric|| Symmetric in one plane, antisymmetric in another&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The diene has a total energy of 0.02771132 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The anhydride has a total energy of -0.12182409 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.16017081 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adduct has a total energy of -0.15990931 Hartrees, therefore the endo adduct is the more thermodynamically stable out of the two products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05150480 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state has a total energy of -0.05041984 Hartrees&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331613</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331613"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T04:00:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Diels-Alder */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Antisymmetric|| Symmetric in one plane, antisymmetric in another&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331612</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331612"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:57:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may be exothermic and may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths again suggest that the transition state occurs early on in the reaction and the angle of the forming bond again suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point of the reaction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331611</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331611"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:38:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths of the transition structure more closely resemble those of the reactants than the adduct&#039;s bond lengths. Considering that along with the fact the change in entropy of this reaction would be negative as two molecules are forming one, the reaction may have an early have an early transition state which would more closely resemble the reactants in accordance with Hammond&#039;s postulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The angle between C=O-C-H bond and the forming C-C sigma bond is about 100°, where as the equivalent angle for the adduct is about 113°. If it is assumed that the maleic anhydride approaches the diene at 90°, then this suggests that the transition state is just before the halfway point in the reaction coordinate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are similar results for the exo adduct and transition state&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Exo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Exo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331610</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331610"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:14:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|500px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331608</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331608"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:13:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a change of distances between many of the atoms due to the making and breaking of several carbon carbon bonds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the endo structures, the bond lengths of interest are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Endo Structures&lt;br /&gt;
! Transition State!! Adduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || [[Image:Endo TS distances.png|thumb|300px|Endo Transition State ]]|| [[Image:Endo distances.png|thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]] || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| cell || cell || cell || cell&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS_distances.png&amp;diff=331605</id>
		<title>File:Exo TS distances.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS_distances.png&amp;diff=331605"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:06:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_distances.png&amp;diff=331604</id>
		<title>File:Exo distances.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_distances.png&amp;diff=331604"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:06:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS_distances.png&amp;diff=331603</id>
		<title>File:Endo TS distances.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS_distances.png&amp;diff=331603"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:06:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_distances.png&amp;diff=331602</id>
		<title>File:Endo distances.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_distances.png&amp;diff=331602"/>
		<updated>2013-03-15T03:06:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331400</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331400"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:49:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cyclohexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Cyclohexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of Maleic anhydride was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000167     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000056     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000907     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000312     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.502697D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -0.0180   -0.0104   -0.0008    2.8733    6.4107   11.3007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  155.8845  265.8974  382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   155.8845               265.8973               382.8494&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --    15.8572                 3.6760                13.5036&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.2270                 0.1531                 1.1662&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     1.0503                 0.0000                23.8302&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:MALEIC_ANHYDRIDE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Maleic anhydride.png|thumb|300px|Maleic Anhydride]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of endo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000102     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000840     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000189     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.874703D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6633   -0.6840   -0.2503   -0.0034    0.1130    1.7882&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   72.1977  148.2059  167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    72.1976               148.2059               167.4255&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1640                 9.0542                 7.5959&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0159                 0.1172                 0.1255&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1402                 4.9418                 0.9083&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo adduct.png |thumb|300px|Endo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of exo-adduct was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation - frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000656     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000142     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.026530D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -2.6160   -2.2275   -0.2565   -0.0027    0.1138    1.5370&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   70.6655  148.5658  168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    70.6654               148.5658               168.7536&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     5.1773                11.0120                 6.0630&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0152                 0.1432                 0.1017&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.1457                 4.1071                 1.9500&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo adduct.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo Adduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised reactants and products were used to attain the transition states for the two possible paths of the reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly the endo adduct was used as the product with cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants. A joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up, optimising to QST2 transition state at the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000017     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000197     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000039     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.144656D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged on as there was an imaginary (negative frequency) which was caused by the bond forming vibrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -806.3608   -1.1611   -1.0189   -0.2526   -0.0104    0.7037&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.7526   62.4360  111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -806.3608                62.4360               111.7370&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     6.7020                 4.3325                 6.8014&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.5675                 0.0100                 0.0500&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    71.6009                 1.5331                 3.4385&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Endo TS.png|thumb|300px|Endo adduct transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exo adduct transition state was found using a similar method. With the exo adduct assigned as the product and the cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride as the reactants, a joint optimisation-frequency calculation was set up to converge on a QST2 transition state to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000019     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000905     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000219     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.745176D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again the frequencies confirmed that a transition state had been converged upon as there was an imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -812.2048   -1.3419   -0.9671   -0.0047    0.3850    1.0398&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    2.2924   60.8664  123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -812.2048                60.8664               123.8706&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0435                 4.4895                 7.1640&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7376                 0.0098                 0.0648&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --    96.8769                 0.5530                 0.0413&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Exo TS.png ‎ |thumb|300px|Exo adduct transition state]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331330</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:captainmurphy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:captainmurphy&amp;diff=331330"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:02:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: /* Diels-Alder */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Cope Rearrangement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of Reactants and Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of 1,5-Hexadiene with the central carbon atoms in 2-app conformation was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App2 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px| app2 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000060     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000010     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000525     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000171     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.037394D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    HEX15DIENE_OPTIM&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69253528     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001891     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minimum was converged upon. Ideally, the conformation should have a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, however, due to slight differences between each bond length and bond angle, the optimised molecule has no centre of inversion there a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group. Link to the .log file below&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/d/dd/HEX15DIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A optimisation calculation of lower energy antiperiplanar conformer, app1, of 1,5-hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:App1 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|app1 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000020     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000668     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.761864D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;1app 1,5-hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app1_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69260236     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001217     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.2023     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24099}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimisation calculation of the gauche 3 conformation of 1,5-Hexadiene was run using the HF method and 3-12g basis. The optimised molecule also had a C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group, though ideally it should have C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gauche3 15hexadiene.png|thumb|300px|Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000014     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000498     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000192     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.041803D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Calculation had the following results&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Gauche3 1,5-Hexadiene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    gauche3_15hexadiene_optim_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RHF&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    3-21G&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RHF)    -231.69266122     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00000446     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.3407     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    C1&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24075}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The app2 conformer was re-optimised using the DFT method and 6-31G basis set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000015     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000219     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000079     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.589047D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The results for the calculations are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Hex-1,5-diene optimisation&lt;br /&gt;
File Name    app2_15hexadiene_optim_DFT_output&lt;br /&gt;
File Type    .log&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Type    FOPT&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation Method    RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
Basis Set    6-31G(d)&lt;br /&gt;
Charge    0&lt;br /&gt;
Spin    Singlet&lt;br /&gt;
E(RB3LYP)    -234.61170280     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
RMS Gradient Norm    0.00001326     a.u.&lt;br /&gt;
Imaginary Freq&lt;br /&gt;
Dipole Moment    0.0000     Debye&lt;br /&gt;
Point Group    CI&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24115}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly, the point group of the reoptimised molecule is C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus the centre of inversion has been restored&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was then run of the reoptimised molecule using the same method and basis set. The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sums of energies were taken a note of:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and zero-point Energies=           -234.469212&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Energies=              -234.461856&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Enthalpies=            -234.460912&lt;br /&gt;
 Sum of electronic and thermal Free Energies=         -234.500821&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optimisation of &amp;quot;Chair&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Boat&amp;quot; Transition Structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An allyl fragment was drawn and optimised to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000044     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000018     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000175     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.235912D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24161}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Single allyl fragment.png|thumb|300px|Allyl fragment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess transition state was drawn using two allyl fragments with a proximity of roughly 2.2Å to each other(2.20688 and 2.20198Å).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was first optimised in a single optimisation and frequency calculation. The two fragments were optimised to a transition state with force constants calculated once. opt=noeigen was used as an additional keyword. The calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000009     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000216     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000061     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.255335D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An imaginary frequency of about 818cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; was calculated (N.B. that it has a negative sign in the log file)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -817.9412   -1.7066   -1.2826    0.0006    0.0007    0.0009&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.9264  209.5416  396.0238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two ends were 2.02036 and 2.02042Å apart from each other, so there had been a change of the fragments&#039; positions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24163}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt1.png|thumb|300px|First optimisation of transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guess structure was optimised again, however this time just in a single optimisation calculation. Coordinates were set for each of the carbon atom bond breaking/forming pairs. Both of the coordinates were set as bond; freeze coordinates. The structure was optimised to a minimum with force constants not calculated. Again, the calculation was run to HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000034     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001212     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000369     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.814707D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.20688 and 2.20198Å, i.e. the position of the fragments had not changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24165}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chair TS opt2.png|thumb|300px|Second optimisation of the transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This structure was then reoptimised, however, the coordinates were adjusted to bond; derivative of each pair and the structure was optimised to a transition state. HF/3-21g level of theory was used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000049     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000013     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001381     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000273     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-6.950108D-07&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distance between the fragment ends were 2.01913 and 2.01910Å.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space: {{DOI|10042/24169}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Link0.png|thumb|300px|Reoptimised transition structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diels-Alder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Butadiene===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cis-butadiene molecule was optimised to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory. The calculation converged upon a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000025     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000011     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000318     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-8.152977D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The optimised molecule has C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; point group symmetry. This is caused by a sigma symmetry plane across the molecule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/6e/CIS_BUTADIENE_OPTIM.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation of the molecule was run and HOMO and LUMO was visualised. The HOMO has a A&#039; symmetry where as the LUMO has a A&#039;&#039; symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Cis-Butadiene HOMO/LUMOs&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:Cis butadiene HOMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene HOMO]]|| [[Image:Cis butadiene LUMO.png|thumb|300px|Cis-Butadiene LUMO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/6/61/CIS_BUTADIENE_MO.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A frequency calculation was run, revealing that the optimised planar cis butadiene in fact is a transition state. This is indicated by the imaginary (negative) frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---  -39.9802   -5.7100   -3.4687   -2.2322   -0.0003    0.0149&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    0.0469  312.4533  485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                    A&amp;quot;                     A&#039;                     A&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --   -39.9801               312.4533               485.1744&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4869                 2.6016                 1.1394&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0014                 0.1496                 0.1580&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0339                 7.9405&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s log file: https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/CIS_BUTADIENE_FREQ.LOG&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another cis-butadiene molecule was drawn with a dihedral twist between the two central carbons. This was optmised and frequencies were calculated in single operation carried out to the semi-empirical AM1 level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000027     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001345     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000497     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-9.201512D-09&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation had converged on a single point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies were all positive, thus indicating that this is a possible conformation of cis-butadiene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -3.1387   -2.6778   -1.6416    0.0032    0.1230    0.2774&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   53.8133  304.3830  480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    53.8126               304.3830               480.2925&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.4974                 2.5655                 1.1704&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0026                 0.1400                 0.1591&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0251                 0.0412                 7.6793&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The calculation was published on D-space {{DOI|10042/24239}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State of Diels-Alder Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of the transition state was drawn and then optimised to a transition state in a joint optimisation/frequency calculation to the HF/3-21g level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001130     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000262     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.850229D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that is was a transition state was confirmed as there were imaginary frequencies calculated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -818.1909   -2.6568   -1.9920   -0.0007   -0.0007   -0.0007&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---    1.1139  166.6501  284.3579&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -818.1909               166.6500               284.3578&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     7.0080                 2.0105                 4.4032&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     2.7641                 0.0329                 0.2098&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     9.3180                 0.6930                 1.1452&lt;br /&gt;
 Raman Activ --   186.0085                 0.1520                 5.9205&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (P) --     0.4421                 0.7500                 0.7500&lt;br /&gt;
 Depolar (U) --     0.6131                 0.8571                 0.8571&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The imaginary frequency being the negative one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is of the Cs point group, thanks to having a σ plane of symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A population calculation was run the HOMO and LUMO of the transition state were visualised  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ HOMO &amp;amp; LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State&lt;br /&gt;
! HOMO!! LUMO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Image:DA TS HOMO.png|thumb|300px|HOMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]|| [[Image:DA TS LUMO.png|thumb|300px|LUMO of Diels-Alder Transition State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state was reoptimised again in a joint optimistaion/frequency calculation to the DFT/6-31g* level of theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000041     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.001237     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000362     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.523562D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, the fact that this was a transition state was confirmed by the presence of an imaginary frequency in the frequency analysis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies --- -524.7891   -8.0596   -0.0007   -0.0004   -0.0001    9.1064&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   19.3303  135.8146  203.8497&lt;br /&gt;
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --  -524.7888               135.7607               203.8373&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     8.2420                 2.1652                 3.9546&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     1.3374                 0.0235                 0.0968&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     5.8120                 0.7227                 0.9943&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DA TS.png|thumb|300px|Diels-Alder transition state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regioselectivity when Maleic Anhydride is used as the Dienophile===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the Diels-Alder reaction between cyclohexadiene and maleic anhydride, there are two isomers that can be the product: the endo adduct and the exo adduct. One of these adducts is the predominant product when the reaction is under kinetic control, whereas the other is thermodynamic product. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A guess structure of cyclohexadiene was drawn and optimised to the semi-empirical/AM1 level of theory in a joint optimisation and frequency calculation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000079     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000015     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000811     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000243     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.350086D-08&lt;br /&gt;
 Optimization completed.&lt;br /&gt;
    -- Stationary point found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frequencies confirmed that the optimised structure was realistic, i.e. all the frequencies were positive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   -4.6495   -1.1995   -0.0160    0.0590    0.1371    4.3120&lt;br /&gt;
 Low frequencies ---   99.3786  276.7750  457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering&lt;br /&gt;
 activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized&lt;br /&gt;
 incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),&lt;br /&gt;
 and normal coordinates:&lt;br /&gt;
                     1                      2                      3&lt;br /&gt;
                     A                      A                      A&lt;br /&gt;
 Frequencies --    99.3784               276.7750               457.6047&lt;br /&gt;
 Red. masses --     1.6772                 2.0820                 1.9360&lt;br /&gt;
 Frc consts  --     0.0098                 0.0940                 0.2389&lt;br /&gt;
 IR Inten    --     0.0712                 0.0870                 0.0075&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to the calculation&#039;s .log file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/index.php?title=File:CYCLOHEXADIENE_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS.png&amp;diff=331328</id>
		<title>File:Exo TS.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_TS.png&amp;diff=331328"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:01:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Exo TS.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS.png&amp;diff=331327</id>
		<title>File:Endo TS.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_TS.png&amp;diff=331327"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:01:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Endo TS.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct.png&amp;diff=331326</id>
		<title>File:Exo adduct.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Exo_adduct.png&amp;diff=331326"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:01:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct.png&amp;diff=331325</id>
		<title>File:Endo adduct.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Endo_adduct.png&amp;diff=331325"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:01:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Maleic_anhydride.png&amp;diff=331324</id>
		<title>File:Maleic anhydride.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Maleic_anhydride.png&amp;diff=331324"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:01:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Cyclohexadiene.png&amp;diff=331323</id>
		<title>File:Cyclohexadiene.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Cyclohexadiene.png&amp;diff=331323"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T22:01:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&amp;diff=331313</id>
		<title>File:ENDO ADDUCT TS OPTIM FREQ.LOG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:ENDO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&amp;diff=331313"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T21:50:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&amp;diff=331312</id>
		<title>File:EXO ADDUCT TS OPTIM FREQ.LOG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:EXO_ADDUCT_TS_OPTIM_FREQ.LOG&amp;diff=331312"/>
		<updated>2013-03-14T21:50:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cif110: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cif110</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>